Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1881 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1881 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Re-testing of Narcotic Samples in NDPS Case. Court Holds That Sending Reserved Sample to CFSL Does Not Prejudice Accused's Right to Fair Trial Under NDPS Act.

The applicant, Michael Onyeka Jude, challenged an order dated 10.07.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge for NDPS at Mumbai, which allowed the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons Against Additional Accused in Dowry Death Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Section 319 Cr.P.C. summons set aside as no specific overt acts alleged against petitioners in charge sheet.

The petitioners, arrayed as additional accused nos. 3 to 6 in S.C. No. 2/2013, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt or Liability. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld as Complainant Did Not Establish Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Nupur Sales Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19.06.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...