Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1985 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1985 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Involving Pharmaceutical Marks LOX and XYLOX. Court finds prima facie that Defendants' XYLOX marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's LOX family of marks, and that the defence of common origin or acquiescence is not made out.

16 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Neon Laboratories Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Themis Medicare Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) and Ciro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

21 Aug 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings for Non-Compliance of Order 7 Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That Non-Filing of Plan/Sketch with Plaint Is Not Fatal If Encroachment Can Be Identified Through Other Evidence.

18 Dec 2015

The appellant, Pratapsingh Raoji Rane, filed a suit for mandatory injunction against the respondents, Jitendra Zoiba Rane and others, alleging encroac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order of BBMP Employee Convicted Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Holds That Disciplinary Authority Must Consider Gravity of Offence and Not Automatically Impose Penalty of Dismissal. The Court set aside the order of dismissal from service passed by the Commissioner, BBMP, against a former employee convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, on the ground that the disciplinary authority failed to apply its mind to the facts and circumstances of the case and the quantum of punishment imposed was disproportionate.

17 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Sri Prathap B, was a former employee of the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and was working as in-charge Assistant Revenue ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rectification Deed — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove possession and title over the suit property, and the rectification deed did not alter the defendant's prior rights.

30 Jun 2017

The appellant, Shubhangi Ramesh Bhatkar, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 15 of 2006 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ratnagiri. Sh...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Criminal Revision Application No. 31/2011 — Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. The court held that concurrent findings of fact regarding legally enforceable debt and dishonour of cheque were correct and did not warrant interference.

21 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Kinetic Engineering Ltd., a public limited company, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — LIC Held Not a 'Public Premises' as It Ceased to Be Government Company After 2013 Amendment. The court held that the Estate Officer lacked jurisdiction to order eviction of a tenant from LIC premises because LIC was not a Government company under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises Act, 1971.

31 Jul 2018

The petitioner, M/s Indian Coffee Workers Cooperative Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, was a ten...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises from Tribunal's Order Allowing Deduction Under Section 54F of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal's concurrent findings that the assessee had constructed a residential house within the prescribed period under Section 54F, and the Revenue failed to raise any substantial question of law.

2 Jul 2018

The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 and Income Tax Officer) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the orde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Dated 31.07.2007 Proved and Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Established Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2016

The appellant-defendant filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Sugar Mills' Appeals Against Sugarcane Price Fixation Order — State's Power to Fix Minimum Price Upheld. The Court held that the Sugarcane Control Board's order fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per tonne was valid and not arbitrary, as it was based on recommendations of the Cane Commissioner and aimed at protecting farmers' interests.

12 Feb 2015

The case involves appeals by four sugar mills against an order of the Sugarcane Control Board fixing the minimum price of sugarcane at Rs. 2,500 per t...

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)