Search Results for "adjudication proceedings"

5849 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5849 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction on Ground of Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Dispute Under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959

The case involves an appeal filed by Zuberahmed Maqbool Ansari (original Defendant No.2) against an ad-interim order dated 24.09.2020 passed by a lear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Interest on Seized Amount Returned Without Interest Under FERA. Court holds that interest is payable on amounts seized and retained by the Enforcement Directorate when ultimately returned to the owner, applying principles of restitution and equity.

The petitioners, M/s R.K. Jewellers (a partnership firm) and M/s N.B. Exports (a proprietary concern), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Court sets aside ex-parte order and restores Land Acquisition Reference for fresh adjudication on merits.

The revision petitioner, Malanbee W/o Ahmed Saab Mulla, was the owner and possessor of Survey/Gat No. 362/411-2, admeasuring 44 R, situated at Murum, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman's Appeal for Wages Under Section 17-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Employer's Challenge Dismissed. Court held that workman is entitled to last drawn wages during pendency of proceedings before Labour Court, irrespective of employer's financial hardship.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA 294/2010 and LPA 296/2010) arising from an order of a Single Judge dated 26.10.2010 in Writ Petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Valuation Case — Issue Already Adjudicated by CESTAT. Principle of Res Judicata Applied to Successive Show Cause Notices for Enhancing Invoice Value Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s. Royal Oil Field Private Limited, entered into a contract on February 25, 2002 with M/s. IMX Port National Trading Corporation, Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Dispute. Court holds that Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC requires the plaint to be read as a whole and the defence cannot be considered for deciding whether the suit is barred by law.

The petitioners, original defendants, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 26.04.2011 passed by the Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CESTAT Remand Order in Central Excise Refund Claim — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's Remand for Fresh Adjudication with All Issues Kept Open Does Not Give Rise to Appealable Question Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Assistant Commissioner ...