Search Results for "additional information"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "additional information"

7853 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7853 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Criminal Case for Additional Evidence Under Section 391 CrPC — Trust Deed and Resolution Crucial for Defence. The Court held that the appellate court has wide discretion to take additional evidence if necessary for a just decision, and the rejection of applications under Section 391 CrPC was erroneous.

28 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Brig. Sukhjeet Singh (Retd.) against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 17.01.2017, which ha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

7 Sep 2016

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.853 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against CIDCO's Refusal to Grant NOC for Additional FSI for IT/ITES Development. Government Order dated 31st August 2009 enabling additional FSI for IT/ITES use is binding on CIDCO as a planning authority.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Coop. Societies Act, 1960, filed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Oct 2015

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition by Retired Central Government Employee Against Union of India Regarding Reimbursement of Heart Transplant Expenses. The Court Considers Whether Normal Reimbursement Rules Should Be Relaxed in Life-Saving Situations Where Treatment Not Available in Empanelled Hospitals.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioner, a retired Central Government employee from Pune, was a pensioner residing in Mumbai. He voluntarily retired in March 2008 as Assistant...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish complete chain of circumstances and motive, with key witnesses turning hostile and burden under Section 106 Evidence Act not triggered.

2 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his two young sons. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Family Massacre but Remands for Fresh Sentencing on Death Penalty. The court found the ocular testimony of eyewitnesses credible despite acquittal of one co-accused, but held that the death sentence requires independent assessment of reform and rehabilitation under Section 302/34 IPC.

15 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a brutal murder case where six members of a family were killed on January 23, 2014, in Bulandsha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Forgery Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court holds that acceptance of summary report without considering FIR allegations and without examining witnesses vitiates the order, and that the informant has locus standi to challenge such acceptance.

16 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Avneesh Harvansh Singh, is the first informant who lodged an FIR on 22 September 2015 against respondent nos.2 to 6, who are co-truste...

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)