Search Results for "Bombay High Court guidelines"

3118 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3118 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of Recruitment Rules for Civil Judges (Junior Division) — Direct Recruitment Process Upheld. Petitions challenging the selection and seniority dismissed as the Rules were held valid and the process fair.

The petitioners, who were candidates for direct recruitment as Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the Karnataka Judicial Service, challenged the validi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Writ Petitions Against School Tribunal’s Order in Headmaster Promotion Dispute. Challenge to Promotion on Grounds of Jurisdiction, Delay, and Minority School Status.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, arose from two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Transfer Dispute. Workman's Compliance with Transfer Order Renders Complaint Infructuous; Interim Relief Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s NRB Bearings Limited, challenged an order dated 08/07/2015 passed by the Industrial Court, Jalna, in Complaint (ULP) No.56/2015. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Wankhede Stadium to Mumbai Cricket Association. Court holds that lease of public property at nominal rent for promoting sports is not arbitrary and is a valid policy decision.

The petitioners, including Aam Aadmi Party and individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes State Government Order on Premature Release of Convict in Criminal Writ Petition - Order Under Section 433A CrPC Found Erroneous Due to Misapplication of Sentencing Guidelines and Supreme Court Directions.

The petitioner, a 65-year-old convict, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 19th September ...