Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

5031 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5031 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff in Commercial Suit for Leave to File Additional Documents Due to Timely Application and Necessity for Just Decision. Court held that plaintiff's application under Order VII Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 of CPC should be permitted as it was filed within 30 days of suit filing under Order XI Rule 1(4) and documents were essential for fair trial in trademark infringement case.

15 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant for trademark infringement relate...

High Court

Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Decides Regular First Appeal in a Partition, Declaration and Injunction Suit. The Court Allows or Dismisses the Appeal Based on the Merits of the Case.

29 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

5 Jun 2017

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Two Notices of Motion in Property Trespass Suit Alleging Defective Verification and Improper Institution of Plaint. The Court Examines Whether Plaint Filed by Constituted Attorney Without Personal Knowledge and on Unstamped Power of Attorney Should Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and Maharashtra Stamp Act.

6 Sep 2019

The suit was filed by Sheikhah Fedi ah Saad Al - Abdullah Al - Sabah against Sanjay Mishrimal Punamiya and others alleging trespass into suit premises...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit: Time Spent in Order IX Rule 13 Proceedings Can Constitute Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Under Section 96(2) CPC. The Court held that the right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is a statutory right and cannot be barred by dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, and that time spent in pursuing such proceedings can be considered sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

7 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Bhivchandra Shankar More against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had refused to condone the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

6 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Election Process of Housing Society for Violation of Bye-Laws and Cooperative Societies Act. Appointment of Returning Officer by Managing Committee held invalid as Bye-Law No. 49 vests such power in the General Body under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

15 Mar 2024

The petitioners, eleven members of The Ashwamedh C.H.S. Ltd., a cooperative housing society, along with the society itself, filed a writ petition chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Legislative Council Board Order Granting Retrospective Seniority. The Court Examines Whether the Board's Order Violates Principles of Delay and Laches by Disturbing Seniority After 16 Years.

9 Jul 2019

The case arose from a seniority dispute among Section Officers in the Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat. The petitioners, Meghana Dilip Talekar, Shi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Gratuity in Pending Criminal Appeals Under Kerala Service Rules. Interpretation of Rules 3 and 3A of Kerala Service Rules Distinguishes Pension from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity, Prohibiting Withholding Despite Conviction with Suspended Sentence.

15 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from a Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the entitlement of government employees to D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Late Filing of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Service of Writ of Summons Not Mandatory When Defendant Has Entered Appearance and Received Plaint and Notice of Motion. The court held that the object of service of summons is to give notice, and if the defendant has already appeared and received the plaint, formal service is not required under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

21 Dec 2022

The Petitioner, Metro Ortem Ltd, a public limited company, filed a Commercial Suit No. 3 of 2019 before the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai against ...

73 74 75 76 77

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)