Search Results for "temporary employment"

1175 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1175 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Zilla Parishad's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders After 8-Year Delay. Delay of 8 years and 1 month in challenging Industrial Court's judgment not satisfactorily explained; petitions dismissed on ground of laches and delay.

The petitioner, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad Jalna, filed two writ petitions challenging the common judgment dated 19/12/2006 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Petition with Weekly Holidays Counted as Worked Days and Interest at 10%. Employee entitled to additional gratuity based on retrospective pay revision and interest for delayed payment under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Rama Khakale, a retired employee of Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Upholds 100% Loss of Earning Capacity for Amputation of Three Fingers. Schedule I of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 is Not Exhaustive; Commissioner Can Assess Functional Disability Based on Evidence.

The appeal was filed by the employer, M/s. Bharat Emery Works and its partners, challenging the award dated 19.02.2009 passed by the Labour Officer an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Workman Challenging Termination as Contractual Appointment Not Covered Under Industrial Disputes Act. Workman Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Project Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, D.N. Shivaraj, was appointed as a Work Inspector on 06.08.1990 by the Belgaum Urban Development Authority (respondent No.1) and the Gov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in CRPF Compulsory Retirement Case — Punishment Valid Under Rules. Compulsory Retirement Held to Be a Species of Removal Permissible Under Section 11 of CRPF Act Read with Rule 27 of CRPF Rules.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and CRPF authorities against the judgment of the Orissa High Court, which had set aside the punishme...