Search Results for "service tax recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "service tax recovery"

1175 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1175 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations and Demand for Customs Duty in Sugar Export Cases. Non-compliance with export obligation due to government-imposed export ban constitutes force majeure, and demand for duty with interest cannot be sustained.

20 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies engaged in sugar trading and export, challenging the cancellation of advance authorizatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Orders Declaring Abatement and Rejecting Substitution in Second Appeal. Non-Substitution of Legal Heir of Co-Appellant Results in Whole Appeal Abating Where Decree is Joint and Indivisible, and Delay Condonation Denied as No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Order XXII CPC and Limitation Act.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a civil suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and mesne profits regarding a house. The plaintiff claimed exclusive titl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. Appeal involves multiple interim applications and stakeholders including developers and financial institutions.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Petitioner Challenges NCLT Order Admitted Under Section 7 IBC on Ground of Non-Pronouncement and Violation of NCLT Rules. High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Petition Alleging Order Non-Est for Lack of Pronouncement in Open Court.

29 Nov 2019

Not mentioned - judgment text incomplete...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

15 Dec 2011

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Interest Refund Case — Interest Under Section 27A Payable from Date of Payment of Duty. The court held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962, and interest is payable from the date of payment of duty.

13 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Mar 2012

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Mar 2012

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Suit for Recovery of Possession Based on Prior Possession Maintainable Without Proof of Title. The Court held that a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is maintainable for recovery of possession based on prior possession alone, and the defendant cannot raise the question of title.

19 Nov 2005

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a judgment of the City Civil Court ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Title and Possession. Family Arrangement and Adverse Possession Claims Fail as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Necessary Parties Were Not Impleaded.

2 Jan 2025

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the defendant Selvaraj against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which ...

73 74 75 76 77

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)