Search Results for "section 23(3)"

895 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 895 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages for Termination Without Enquiry. Violation of Sections 25F and 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Found as Employee Was Not Given Notice or Compensation and Principle of Last Come First Go Was Not Followed.

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners (the Principal of Industrial Training Institute, Khamgaon, and the Joint Director of Vocational Educa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rudresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chitradurga in S.C.No.23/2011 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Bid in Tender for Road Maintenance Work. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Rejection for Not Submitting Notarized Business Transfer Agreement.

The writ petition sought to challenge the decision of the Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Pune, rejecting the petitioner's bid as non-r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Higher Pay Scale to Chargemen in Ordnance Factories. Classification of Chargemen as 'Workman' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not entitle them to pay scale of supervisors under the Time Scale Scheme.

The petitioners, employees of Ordnance Factories under the Ministry of Defence, filed writ petitions challenging the denial of higher pay scale under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sale by Brother for Legal Necessity Upheld. Daughters' Claim for Partition Dismissed as Sale Deed Dated 28.3.1968 Was Supported by Legal Necessity and Prior Conditional Sale.

The case involves a partition suit filed by two daughters (plaintiffs) against their brother Tukaram and the appellant (defendant no.1), who purchased...