Search Results for "reference procedure"

12242 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12242 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Criminal Revision Application by Medical Practitioners. The Case Involves Interpretation of Legal Provisions in Criminal Procedure and Substantive Law.

The High Court of Bombay considered Criminal Revision Application No. 150 of 2019 filed by Dr. Suhas Sampat Jadhav and Dr. Ashwini Suhas Jadhav, medic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Bombay Public Trust Act Suit for Declaration and Possession, Dismisses Suit as Property Not Trust Property. Earlier Suit for Injunction Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction Did Not Bar Subsequent Suit Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, and Suit Was Within Limitation.

The dispute pertained to a claim by Seth Kasturmal Dalsukh Dharmashala, a registered public trust, that certain property at Dondaicha, District Dhule,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Interim Measures in Arbitration Dispute Over Subsea Pipeline Subcontract. Appellate Bench Reviews Single Judge's Order Requiring Deposit of Invoice Amount Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court, in its commercial appellate jurisdiction, heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Acquiring Body's Challenge to Maintainability of Applications under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Claimants Who Filed Reference under Section 18 Are Not Barred from Seeking Redetermination Under Section 28-A.

The petitioner, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, the acquiring body, filed two writ petitions challenging the maintainability of applicati...