Search Results for "medical contradictions"

1605 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1605 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 447, 147, 148 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, in Sessions Case No.112 of 2001, wher...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Dying Declaration Recorded by Executive Magistrate Without Corroboration Held Insufficient for Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The present appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with a co-accused, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Contradictory Dying Declarations. Dying declarations recorded by Head Constable and Executive Magistrate contradicted each other, and medical evidence raised doubts about deceased's fitness to make a statement, leading to benefit of doubt.

The case arose from the death of Gayatri, who sustained 93% burn injuries at her matrimonial home in Majari Colliery, Chandrapur. The prosecution alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Non-Consensual Nature of Relationship.

The appellant, Pravin Popat Kharat, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Human Trafficking and POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Running Brothel and Exploiting Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Sunita @ Neha Machhindra Chandne and Sharda Machindra Chandne, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 370 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor Victim Not Valid, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ketan Sanjay Kokate, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO, Pune for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 3 punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Tukaram Vithal Bhangare, was convicted by the IInd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his wife Bibabai under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Gulabchand Lalman Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2...