Search Results for "Section 2(54)"

967 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 967 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity. Court upholds concurrent findings that the sale deed was not vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation, and that the appellants failed to prove any substantial question of law.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute. The appellants, Narcinha R. Kalangutkar and others, challenged the concurrent fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurer's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Income Assessment. Tribunal's Award of Rs. 23,59,400 Reduced to Rs. 6,39,000 as Deceased's Income Was Not Properly Proved and Future Prospects Were Wrongly Added.

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 06/01/2011 passed by the XVI Additional Judge, Mot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case Based on Injured Witness Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Articles. Identification of Accused in Test Identification Parade Held Valid Despite Allegations of Prior Exposure.

The case arises from a dacoity and murder that occurred on the night of 27-28 May 1999 in Nallavumpatti village. The deceased, Sengoda Goundar, was sl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death and dowry demand beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nanasaheb Changdeo Nikam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for offences under Sections 302 and 498-A of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Validity of Karnataka Parliamentary Secretaries Allowances Act, 1963 and Appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries. The Court held that the Act is within legislative competence and appointments are valid under Article 164(1-A) of the Constitution.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the constitutional validity ...