Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1400 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1400 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of perpetrator beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Anil Chhotelal Chhevle under Section 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Childr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal, Upholds Injunction Against Demolition Without Due Process. Municipal Corporation Cannot Demolish Premises Without Following Procedure Under Section 478 of Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The appellant, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondent, Tukaram Muttappa Pai, who had purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, Extortion, and Destruction of Evidence. Conviction based on circumstantial evidence including CDRs, extra-judicial confession, and last seen evidence upheld.

The case involved two appeals before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, convicting the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly Not Proved and Doubtful Identification. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove common object under Section 149 IPC and identification of accused was unreliable, leading to acquittal.

The case involves an appeal by five appellants against their conviction by the Sessions Judge, Amravati, for offences including murder under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Criminal Revision Petition in Karnataka Excise Act Case — FIR Based on Panchanama Held Invalid. Conviction Set Aside as Search and Seizure Before Registration of FIR Renders Trial Vitiated.

The case arose from the interception of a motorcycle on 24 November 2008 by Excise officials in Hunsur taluk, Karnataka, who seized 48 bottles of whis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Credible Evidence. Dispute Over Grain Cellar Leads to Fatal Assault, but Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur dated 30 July 1997, acquitting the respondents (Gajen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Allegations of Cruelty Were Vague and Desertion Not Proven, Affirming Family Court's Dismissal of Divorce Petition.

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the Family Court, Pune's order dated 18 July 2000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence Under Section 366 CrPC and Criminal Appeal Against Conviction. The Trial Court Convicted the Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 323 Indian Penal Code and Awarded Death Sentence.

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as a confirmation reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal app...