Search Results for "Section 13(2) notice"

1228 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1228 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Declaring Licence Fees Ultra Vires under U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. Imposition of Rs. 30/- and Rs. 51/- Licence Fees on Rickshaw Owners and Drivers Lacked Sufficient Quid Pro Quo, Rendering Bye-Laws Invalid.

The dispute arose from bye-laws framed by the Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi (Municipal Board) under the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, imposing annual li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Society's Writ Petitions Against Unauthorized Construction by Members. Dispute Between Society and Member Regarding Unauthorized Construction and Possession is Barred from Civil Court Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, The Manglorian Garden Homes Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed three writ petitions challenging the orders of the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate Leads to Acquittal. The court held that non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, 1985, vitiates the trial and entitles the accused to acquittal.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by individuals convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows OCI Cardholders to Appear for CET and Other Entrance Exams — OCI Cardholders Are Eligible for Admission to Professional Courses Under Karnataka State Quota as Per Central Government Orders.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by OCI (Overseas Citizen of India) cardholders, including Soundarya Muthumari, who sought direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Accused Juvenile and Quashes Death Sentence Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Age Determination Based on School Birth Certificate Prevails Over Ossification Test, Leading to Release After Over 5 Years Incarceration as Maximum Sentence for Juvenile Below 16 is 3 Years.

The Supreme Court heard appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 15.11.2018 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which affirmed the death sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...