Search Results for "IPC Section 376"

1222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Ill 60-Year-Old Woman Under Section 376 IPC. Evidence of Incapacitated Victim and DNA Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajmat Shaha @ Ajju Tayyab Shaha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, District Akola, for the offence punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Based on Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence. Promise of Marriage to a 12-13 Year Old Girl Constitutes False Promise Vitiating Consent Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Bhaiyya Subhash Panpatil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage — Consent Not Vitiated as Relationship Was Consensual and Prolonged. Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Credibility Due to Inconsistencies and Delay in FIR; Conviction Under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside.

The appellant, Anwar Khan Iqbal Khan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the offence of rape under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 5(i),(j)(ii),(l)/6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Shashikant Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Special Case No.19/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Medical Evidence and Doubtful Testimony. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ganga Prasad Mahto, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly raping the prosecutrix (PW3) on the ni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Plea of Accused in POCSO Case Due to Incomplete Victim Examination. Release Until Completion of Victim's Testimony Held Prejudicial to Prosecution Under Sections 5(L) and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The matter arose from a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the petitioner Byresh seeking bail in co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and POCSO Act. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Ranjit Ghutke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the rape of a 13-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty. Petitioner's bail cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC for threatening victim and tampering with evidence, violating bail conditions under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, accused No.2 in Crime No.146/2023, was charged with offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Prosecution Fails to Prove Victim Was Under 18 Years or That Accused Took Her Without Consent Under Section 363 IPC.

The appellant, Mubarak, was convicted by the Second Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in Special Case No.176/2006 for offences unde...