Search Results for "Expeditious Disposal"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Trust Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Direction to Implead Trustee in Appeal Before Charity Commissioner Upheld as Petitioner Was Already Represented by Trust.

The judgment concerns a review petition filed by Ganesh N. Salunkhe against an order dated 4 February 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 174 of 2015. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Trust Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Direction to Implead Trustee in Appeal Before Charity Commissioner Was Made with Consent and Is Not Contrary to Order XLI Rule 20 CPC.

The review petitioner, Ganesh N. Salunkhe, sought review of an order dated 4 February 2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 174 of 2015. The order directed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Stays Eviction of Daughter-in-Law from Matrimonial Home in Property Dispute with In-Laws. Trial Court's Order at Notice of Motion Stage Held to Be in Nature of Final Decree; Right to Residence Under Domestic Violence Act Recognized.

The appellant, Bharati Rajesh Bhave, filed an appeal against an order passed by the trial judge on 3rd October 2015, which allowed a notice of motion ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Retrenched Daily Wagers Challenging Termination Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act. Appointments for 11-month periods without indicating temporary nature deemed regular, termination illegal.

The petitioners, Arun Rambhau Phatak and Sarjirao Mahadeo Bhalerao, were working as Helpers to Cooks on a daily wage basis from 1984 to 2001 at Mahatm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Daily Wage Employees Against Agricultural University for Illegal Termination. Termination of Daily Wage Cooks Without Notice or Compensation Held Illegal Due to Non-Disclosure of Temporary Nature of Employment.

The petitioners, Arun Rambhau Phatak and Sarjirao Mahadeo Bhalerao, were daily wage helpers to cooks at Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, from ...