Search Results for "sufficient reasons"

11541 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11541 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Suit Against Unserved Defendant Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons on Defendant No.1(c) Despite Court Directions and Lapse of Over Three Years Justifies Dismissal; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Invoking Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner/plaintiff filed R.A.D. Suit No.600 of 2005 before the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of tenancy/deemed tenancy in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Based on Lease Agreement — Civil Dispute Not Attracting Section 420 IPC. The court held that the dispute was purely civil and lacked the essential ingredients of cheating under Section 420 IPC, as there was no initial dishonest intention.

The applicant, Prakash Ramdeo Jaiswal, a director of M/s. Shrihari Rice Mill & Agro Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal application under Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Application Under Section 482 CrPC and Discharges Accused in Cheating Case. Lease Agreement Dispute Lacks Dishonest Intention Required for Section 420 IPC.

The applicant, Deepak Jaiswal, a director of M/s D.J. Enterprises Ltd., filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC Set Aside

The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 147, 148, and 302 read with 149 IPC for the murder ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Specific Performance Suit — Unexplained Delay of Over 8 Years Not Condonable. Cross-Objection Filed After 3015 Days Without Sufficient Cause Rejected Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment pertains to an application for condonation of delay of 3015 and 3166 days in filing cross-objection in Second Appeals No. 658/2007 and 70...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application Filed by Original Plaintiff Against Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence. Litigant Must Inform Court or Advocate of Change of Address and Cannot Blame Advocate for Non-Appearance.

This civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arose from an order of the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, wh...