Search Results for "duty enhancement"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Parents of Deceased MBA Student, Enhances Compensation from Rs. 2 Lakh to Rs. 23.38 Lakh in Motor Accident Claim. Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 Per Month Adopted with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Sujeet Singh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Co-operative Appellate Court's Order Setting Aside Termination and Awarding Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement. Employee's termination by Suvarnayug Sahakari Bank set aside; compensation of Rs. 35,00,000 awarded instead of back-wages.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions arising from a dispute between Suvarnayug Sahakari Bank Ltd. (the Bank) and its former employee, Suresh Shi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Maintenance to Second Wife in Section 125 CrPC Case Despite Void Marriage Due to Husband's Deception. Husband Cannot Deny Maintenance on Ground of Invalidity of Marriage When He Concealed Prior Marriage.

The petitioner, Mrs. Alka Bhausaheb Bhad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment and Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order in Service Charges Dispute. Applicant Company Held to be Necessary Party as Successor-in-Interest of Defendant Firm Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a suit (Suit No. 6117 of 2007) against M/s. Kishore Engineering Co. (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Method Applied for Permanent Disability. Claimant with 20% disability awarded Rs. 1,51,140/- with interest at 6% per annum under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Snehalata Wd/o Arunkumar Pandya, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for inj...