Search Results for "assessment"

Trending :

Search Results for "assessment"

775 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 775 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Displaced Person in Railway Employment Case — Entire House Demolition Qualifies Under Policy Circular. Court holds that demolition of entire residential house constitutes 'house taken away' under Railway Board Circular dated 19.04.2006, entitling displaced person to consideration for Group D employment.

22 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from the rejection of the appellant's claim for employment under the Railway Board's policy for displaced persons. The appellant's fa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Quashing of FIRs in Non-Compoundable Offences Based on Compromise. The Court held that Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash serious offences like attempt to murder and robbery merely on compromise, as it affects public interest and societal order.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against separate High Court orders quashing criminal proceedings on the ba...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Re-investigation of Triple Murder Case, Directs CBI to Examine SIT Report. Court finds SIT report consistent with original charge sheet but notes lack of professional rigour in initial investigation.

20 Feb 2019

The case arises from the murder of Smt. Seema Garg, daughter-in-law of petitioner No.1, and her two children on 24.07.2001. FIR No.221 of 2001 was lod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Eyewitness Testimony Despite Minor Contradictions. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Applied to Accused Who Caught Hold of Deceased, Facilitating Fatal Shot.

19 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Balvir Singh, Bhav Singh, and Harnam Singh against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court affirming their convicti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Consignment Agent Dispute — MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. Scope of Interference with Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limited to Grounds of Public Policy and Patent Illegality.

18 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by MMTC Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had upheld the majority arbitral a...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)