Search Results for "Section 148 Income Tax Act"

763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax Reassessment Notices for Lack of Proper Sanction. Reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 quashed as the approval under Section 151 was granted without proper application of mind by the specified authority.

The petitioner, Altisource Business Solutions India Pvt Ltd, filed three writ petitions challenging reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Cannot Be Based Solely on Subsequent Year's Assessment Order Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The Petitioner, Sitara Diamond Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 20 June 2011 issued u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment after four years requires showing failure to truly and fully disclose material facts, which was not established.

The petitioner, Kapstone Constructions Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings of fact are based on evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gulab (plaintiff) and Ajab (defendant no.2), over a building constructed on Municipal Plot ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused. Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt; Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Confirmed.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Rajubhai Kalidas Chunara, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...