Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1968 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1968 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition in Rent Default and Subletting Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Article 227. Consent Decree Rent Treated as Standard Rent; Subletting Proved by Documentary Evidence.

The petitioner, a partnership firm, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondents. The building was demolished and reconstructed, and the tenant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent's Delayed Nomination of Three Arbitrators After Filing of Application Does Not Bar Court's Power to Appoint Arbitrator.

The applicant, M/s. Krishna Industries, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Probate of Will, Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Due Execution and Attestation. Will dated 4 July 1993 held validly executed under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 9 June 2016 of the Bombay High Court disposing of Testamentary Suit No. 28 of 1995, which sought prob...