Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1899 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1899 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Timber Contract Dispute, Upholding Vesting of Forests and Trees in State Under Abolition Act. Standing Timber Was Not Excluded from Vesting as It Was Not 'Ascertained Goods' Under Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and Conditional Acceptance of Offer Prevented Formation of a New Contract.

11 Oct 1968

The dispute arose from a contract dated December 27, 1950, entered into between the appellant, Badri Prasad, and the jagirdar of Mouza Sunderpani, thr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Sep 2018

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

26 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act — Use of Disjunctive 'or' in Detention Order Does Not Indicate Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority's satisfaction was based on the cumulative effect of the detenu's activities, and the mere reproduction of statutory language does not render the order invalid.

2 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging the preventive detention of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Fore...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Ceiling Orders Under Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 — Civil Suits Barred by Section 26 of the Act. The Court held that the civil suits challenging the Prescribed Authority's order were expressly barred by Section 26(b) of the Act, and the proper remedy was an appeal/revision under Section 18 of the Act.

15 Mar 2019

The appeals arose from two civil suits challenging an order dated 17.10.1978 passed by the Prescribed Authority under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Hold...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice Not Validly Served Under Section 15(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Appellate Bench's decree set aside for failure to consider jurisdictional issue of service of demand notice.

26 Aug 2024

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendant-tenant, Ms. Gloria Lois Crasto, challenging the judgment and decree dated 2 M...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Prize Chit Scheme Case — Failure to Repay Subscribers Constitutes Criminal Breach of Trust. Prize Chit Activity Without Registration Under Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 Attracts Penalty Under Section 406 IPC.

20 Aug 2020

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by Sri Ravindra (since deceased) and Smt. Devamani challenging their conviction under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Condominium Against Developer for Declaration of Rights Over Adjoining Plots as Barred by Limitation. Claims for Easement and Right of Way Held Time-Barred Under Articles 25, 65, and 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Mar 2017

The Plaintiffs, Beach Towers Condominium and its President, filed a suit in 2012 seeking declarations that they have a right of way and easement over ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking De-Registration of Cooperative Housing Society Registered 45 Years Ago. Court holds that post-registration events cannot be grounds for de-registration under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves a rather unusual circumstance where the director of the Petitioner-company has sued himself in connection with proceedings for de-re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

72 73 74 75 76

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)