Search Results for "Expeditious Disposal"

878 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 878 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Under Section 319 CrPC in Murder Case - Sets Higher Evidentiary Standard for Bail in Section 319 Proceedings

The Supreme Court heard two connected criminal appeals regarding bail matters in a murder case -- The first appeal was filed by MD Imran @ D.C. Guddu ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Supplementary Charge-Sheet in Criminal Case for Lack of Prior Permission from Magistrate. Further Investigation Without Leave Under Section 173(8) CrPC Held Invalid as Investigating Officer Failed to Seek Magistrate's Permission Before Filing Supplementary Charge-Sheet.

The petitioners, Sumit S/o Karan Singh Gautam, Imran S/o Abdul Haquie Turak, Ashish S/o Narendra Gajbhiye, and Firozkhaa S/o Moharamkhaa Pathan, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman in Absenteeism and Assault Case, Reduces Backwages to 25%. Industrial Court's reduction of backwages from 50% to 25% upheld as workman failed to prove he was not gainfully employed during dismissal period.

The petitioner, Sahebrao Khemaji Kale, a workman employed as a Painter and later Moulder with Paras Agro Engineering Work, was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Trial Court's Order Permitting Re-examination of Complainant's Witness in NI Act Case. Court holds that once a witness is discharged, recalling for further examination is impermissible without justifiable cause under Section 311 CrPC.

The applicant, Anil s/o Govindrao Chaudhari, challenged two orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur dated 14/9/2012 and 15/01/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Land Allotment for Housing Society Due to Lack of Enforceable Right and Laches. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to allotment of government land under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and the claim was barred by delay and laches.

The petitioner, Pandurang Tukaram Kamble, as Chief Promoter of a proposed housing society, filed two writ petitions seeking allotment of 2.5 acres of ...