Search Results for "personal need"

4493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Employee in Kadamba Transport Corporation Case — Retirement Held Punitive Without Inquiry. Resolution No. 71 of 2007 Set Aside as Board Failed to Record Satisfaction of Inefficiency Under Service Rules.

The petitioner, Mahesh Prabhakar Kamat, was appointed as Accountant in the Kadamba Transport Corporation Limited on 13 December 1982. He was promoted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Applications to Vacate Arrest of Vessels in Bunker Supply Disputes Involving Insolvent Intermediary. Maritime Claim for Bunkers Supplied to Vessel Held Enforceable In Rem Despite Lack of Privity Between Supplier and Owner.

The High Court of Bombay heard two notices of motion filed by the defendants in two admiralty suits seeking to vacate the arrest of their vessels. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows First Wife's Claim for Family Pension Over Invalid Second Marriage. Second Marriage Contracted Without Consent During Subsistence of First Marriage Held Void Under Goa Family Laws and Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1964.

The petitioner, Mrs. Banu Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking family pension as the legally wedded wife of the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Wife and Co-Respondent, Upholds Divorce Decree on Grounds of Adultery, Desertion, and Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's Voluntary Sexual Intercourse with Co-Respondent and Desertion Established by Preponderance of Probabilities.

The case involves two family court appeals arising from a divorce petition filed by Sushil (husband) against Sangeeta (wife) under Section 13(1)(i), (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...