Search Results for "Section 2(54)"

968 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim in GST Arrest Case -- Petitioner's Allegations of Illegal Detention Rejected -- Proper Procedure Followed Under CGST Act

The petitioner, filed a criminal writ petition seeking compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- for alleged illegal arrest and detention by GST authorities -- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination in Sugar Factory Election Due to Violation of Bye-Laws. The Returning Officer's order overruling objection was set aside for failing to properly examine eligibility criteria under Rule 28(2) read with Rule 9 of the bye-laws.

The petitioner, a contesting member in the election to Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (a sugar factory), filed a writ petition challenging the decisio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus Against Railway Board in Jurisdictional Dispute Between Labour Boards Under Mathadi Act. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Applicability of Iron & Steel Scheme vs. Railway Goods Clearing Scheme Cannot Be Resolved in Writ Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, a trade union representing workers registered with the Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Board (Iron & Steel Board), filed a writ petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue Expenditure Classification for Technical Consultancy and Labour Housing in Income Tax Reference. Payments for feasibility studies and labour welfare held deductible as revenue expenditure under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue department. The assessee...