Search Results for "Rule 403"

792 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 792 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced for Widow and Children. Future Prospects and Loss of Consortium Granted Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (widow, children, and parents of the deceased) against the judgment and award dated 3rd April 2018 in MACP No. 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Senior Citizens Act Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners failed to demonstrate any error or new evidence warranting review of judgment dated 19th May 2020.

The present Review Petition was filed by the original petitioners (Nayana Sudhir Shah, Samkit Sudhir Shah, and Shraddha Sudhir Shah) seeking review of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Joint Venture Agreements Not Signed by Appellant, No Arbitration Agreement Between Parties.

The appeal arose from an order dated 8 April 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge dismissing Notice of Motion No. 778 of 2004, which was an applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...