Search Results for "Punjab Municipal Act"

1016 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1016 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Catering Policy 2005 for Railway Minor Units. Petitioners Seek to Quash Policy and Extend Existing Licences Under Catering Policy 2000.

The petitions involved a challenge to the Catering Policy 2005 introduced by the Indian Railways for minor catering units at railway stations across v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Tender Conditions for Sweeping Contract in Nashik Municipal Corporation — Net Worth and Experience Requirements Upheld. Court holds that Clause 3.2.2 and 3.4.2 of RFQ are not arbitrary or discriminatory and are justified for a long-term public hygiene contract.

The petitioner, M/s. Watergrace Products, a proprietorship firm engaged in solid waste management, challenged certain conditions in a Request for Qual...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Loss of Right to Re-test Sample. Applicant's Right Under Section 16(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 to Send Sample to Central Seed Testing Laboratory Lost as Shelf Life of Seed Expired Before Complaint Filed.

The applicant, Regional Manager of Prabhat Agri Bio-Tech Ltd., challenged criminal proceedings in S.C.C. No. 313 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Convict in Gangrape Case on Ground of Juvenility — Inquiry Report Shows Appellant Was Below 18 Years at Time of Offence. Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 Benefit Extended as High Court Failed to Conduct Mandatory Age Determination Inquiry Under Section 7A and Rule 12.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Raju, who was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gangrape and sentenced to 10 year...