Search Results for "Binding settlement"

1648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vessel Owner's Application for Release of Arrested Vessel Due to Repeated Breach of Undertakings and Contempt of Court. Auction Purchaser's Application for Confirmation of Sale Allowed as Vessel Owners Failed to Furnish Security in Time.

The case involves a commercial admiralty suit filed by GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd & Anr against MV Golden Pride & Ors. The vessel was arrested. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement Without Sanction — Proceedings Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Violation of Regulation 16(3) of BESCOM/KPTCL CDA Regulations, 1975

The petitioners, former employees of BESCOM and KPTCL, retired from service between 2014 and 2016. After their retirement, disciplinary proceedings we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Court Holds That the Arbitrator's Finding on Limitation Was Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Executability of Civil Court Decree in Light of Purchase Certificates Issued Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. Decree for Joint Possession Challenged by Judgment-Debtors Claiming Ownership Under Section 32M of the Tenancy Act, Rendering Decree Inexecutable.

The Bombay High Court entertained a writ petition arising from the order dated 28.7.1986 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Islampur, rejecting an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...