Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2698 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2698 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

The petitioner, Sayla Realtors, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated September 25, 2025. By that orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. Supreme Court Precedent in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department Held Binding, District Judge's Order Condoning Delay Restored.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).

The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Family Settlement Matter. Dispute regarding implementation of Escrow Agent directions under Indenture of Family Settlement held arbitrable under Sections 5 and 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Basant Lall Shaw and Arbind Kumar Jayaswal, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...