Search Results for "sentence set aside"

5482 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5482 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in NI Act Case — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction in Appellate Court. Appellate Court Exceeded Its Powers Under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. by Remanding the Case for De Novo Trial Without Finding Any Infirmity in the Trial Court's Judgment.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners (M/S. A. Seating, a partnership firm, and its partners) against the judgment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Sanction. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal was filed by Vinayak Raghunath Wakle, who was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No. 8 of 1998 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366, 343, 376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.65/2014 for offences under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Article 19 of Decree No.35461 on Enforcement of Ecclesiastical Annulment Decrees. Petitions Seek to Nullify Canonical Marriage Annulments and Prevent Civil Endorsements, Questioning the Validity of Pre-Constitution Colonial Law.

Two writ petitions were heard together. In Writ Petition No.351 of 2017, the petitioner wife married the fourth respondent on 26 September 2009 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act as Material Alteration Defence Fails Due to Drawer’s Knowledge. Court Relies on Accused’s Own Photocopy Showing Alteration to Conclude That Alteration Pre-Existed Issuance, Thus No Violation of Section 87.

The case arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the respondent against the petitioner for dishonou...