Search Results for "exception period six years"

1650 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1650 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal, Converts Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder under Section 304 IPC. Single Blow, Absence of Premeditation, and Lack of Motive Lead to Finding That Offence Fell Within Exception to Section 300 of Indian Penal Code.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the murder of Shailesh Junghare. On 23 September 2014, the deceased was stabbed once with a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Acquittal for Murder and Threat, Upholds Conviction Under Section 325 IPC. Acquittal for Offences Under Sections 302 and 506(II) Read with Section 34 IPC Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Non-Explanation of Accused's Injuries.

The State of Maharashtra filed two appeals against the judgment and order of the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 431 of 1989...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consent. Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused Under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Sanjay Jagannath Ursal, was convicted by the IV Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on June 30, 2003 in Sessions Case No.210 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Approval to Teacher Appointment — Education Officer Directed to Grant Approval and Release Salary. Petitioner possessing B.Sc. B.Ed. is a trained teacher under Rule 2(k) of MEPS Rules; refusal on ground of management dispute not sustainable.

The petitioner, Gangadhar Baburao Shere, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 08.09.2015 passed by the Educat...