Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

808 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 808 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Despite Objections on Privity of Arbitration Agreement. Court limits its inquiry under Section 11(6A) to existence of arbitration agreement, leaving issues of privity and liability to arbitral tribunal under Section 16.

The Petitioner, Darshan Mahendra Nibjya, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that orders were not sufficiently clear and specific to warrant contempt proceedings, and the remedy lies in execution.

The petitioner, Sri Sai Krishna Constructions, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of two orders passed by the Bombay High Court i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application in Out-of-State Contract Dispute. Holds That Arbitration Is Not a 'Thing Done' Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and Contract Executed and Performed Outside Maharashtra Is Not Liable to Stamp Duty in Maharashtra.

The applicant, S Satyanarayana & Co, a partnership firm based in Visakhapatnam, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...