ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010
8 Jan 2016The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...
Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"
1965 result(s) found
Found 1965 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Administrative Directions on Bail Listings During Pandemic Due to Judicial Overreach. Single Judge's Orders Restricting Bail Applications and Arrests Exceeded Jurisdiction and Infringed on Chief Justice's Administrative Powers Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
29 Sep 2021The Supreme Court of India heard two connected criminal appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasth...
- 221
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit — Amendment Allowed as Necessary for Determining Real Controversy Between Parties. The court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment to incorporate death of original plaintiff and substitution of legal representatives, holding that pre-trial amendments are to be liberally allowed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
5 Dec 2023The petitioner, M/s. Wrangle Investment Limited, challenged the judgment and order dated 26 September 2019 passed by the Court of Small Causes at Bomb...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Reference Application in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Service of Notice Under Section 12(2). The court permitted the petitioners to amend their reference application to plead that no notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was served, which was relevant to the limitation issue raised by the acquiring body.
4 Jan 2012The petitioners, owners of lands acquired by the Malegaon Municipal Council (now Corporation), were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded under t...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
31 Aug 2012The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Dispute — Lease Not Renewed After Expiry, Tenancy Not Protected Under Rent Act. The court held that a lessee continuing in possession after lease expiry without renewal is not a tenant under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and is liable to vacate.
23 Apr 2015The case involves a civil revision application challenging concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appeal Bench. The prop...
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
9 Jun 2015The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Bus Conductor Challenging Dismissal for Ticketless Passengers and Misappropriation. Industrial Court's concurrent finding of guilt and proportionality of punishment upheld under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14 Sep 2015The petitioner, Chandrakant Manoharrao Waghmare, was a bus conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). He joined s...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal Against Consent Divorce Terms, Directs Execution of Consent Terms for Divorce by Mutual Consent Under Section 28 of Special Marriage Act, 1954. Husband Cannot Resile from Consent Terms After Wife Agreed to All Conditions Including Withdrawal of Allegations and Acceptance of Maintenance.
15 Oct 2016The case involves a husband (Suresh Bhandary) who filed an appeal against a Family Court order granting divorce by mutual consent on certain terms. Th...
- 179
