Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

935 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 935 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Court held that detaining authority failed to demonstrate compelling reasons or imminent possibility of bail, rendering detention order illegal.

The petitioner, Fazal Sikandar Patel, challenged a detention order dated 26.08.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Delayed Action. Preventive detention order set aside due to unexplained delay of four months and failure to supply legible translated documents.

The petitioner, Bandu Kathalu Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 17.01.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Lack of Proximity Between Adverse Cases and Ground Case. Mere Criminal Involvement Insufficient for Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as Cases Could Be Dealt with Under Ordinary Law.

The petitioner, Susila, mother of the detenu Aro @ Arokiyam, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority. Failure to Consider Relevant Material and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Ashish @ Sonu Manmurad Pande, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...