Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Limitation Dispute — Article 64 Limitation Act, 1963 Applicable. High Court erred in holding suit within limitation based on earlier observation; limitation runs from date of dispossession, not from declaration of title.

The present appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute. The appellants are the children of late Srinivas Shetty, who had executed a sale deed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Execution Petition in Limitation Dispute — Decree Merger with Appellate Decree Determines Starting Point for Article 136 Limitation Act, 1963. Doctrine of merger applied to hold that limitation for execution runs from date of appellate decree, not trial court decree.

The case involves a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the executing court dismissing the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation and Cause of Action Are Triable Issues. Court holds that Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cannot be decided on disputed facts regarding knowledge of sale deeds and limitation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by Defendant No.15 (M/s. Mahabharat Builders) challenging the trial court's order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court's Order on Court-Fees Valuation in Suit for Registration under Section 77 of Registration Act. Suit for Enforcement of Statutory Obligation Not Susceptible of Monetary Valuation, Governed by Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court-fees Act, 1958, Not Section 6(xi).

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, seekin...