Search Results for "Jurisdictional Objection"

1411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CSR Expenditure Deduction Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CSR Expenditure Held to Be Incurred Wholly and Exclusively for Business Purposes. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Voltas Limited, a company engaged in air conditioning and refrigeration business, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows School Management's Petition Against School Tribunal Order in Service Dispute. Caste Validity Challenge by Management Not Barred by Limitation Under Section 9 of MEPS Act, 1977.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Vidya Prasarak Mandal Khamgaon and the Head Master of Maharashtra Vidyalaya, Janori, filed a writ petition challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Objection to Execution of Decree Based on Jurisdictional Challenge Under Section 39(4) CPC. Court Holds That Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Execution by the Court That Passed the Decree When the Property Is Situated Outside Its Local Limits.

The present chamber summons arose out of a suit filed by ICICI Ltd, as Debenture Trustees, against Kothri Industrial Corporation Ltd and others for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute. Court holds that an arbitral award granting refund of mobilization advance and damages for breach of contract does not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hind Offshore Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...