Search Results for "Collector permission"

1803 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1803 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Arogya Sevak from OBC and Project Affected Category. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for appointment from OBC and Project Affected Category in accordance with law.

The petitioner, Manisha Namdevrao Chole, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider her claim for appointment to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union’s Excise Duty Demand on Steel Wires; Manufacturer’s Challenge Dismissed. Interpretation of Item 26AA of Central Excise Act as a Rate of Duty, Not Dependent on Origin of Raw Material, Confirmed.

The case arose from the imposition of excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, on steel wires manufactured by the appellant, J.K. Ste...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Appeals Challenging Sale Deeds Executed in Favor of Members. Arbitrator under Delhi Cooperative Societies Act lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate validity of registered sale deeds, which can only be challenged before civil court.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Delhi Dayalbagh Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. against the orders of the Delhi High Court, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Two Companies Challenging Gratuity Payment Order — Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employee's continuous service under same management entitles him to gratuity despite separate corporate identities.

The petitioners, Varma Industrial Private Limited and IBC Knowledge Park Private Limited, challenged the order dated 31.05.2018 passed by the Assistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...