Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement. Invoices Relied Upon by Distributors Did Not Contain Arbitration Clause, and No Other Agreement Was Produced.

The judgment involves multiple arbitration petitions filed by various distributors (petitioners) against Elder Pharmaceuticals Limited (respondent) se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Rejection of Election Petition Filed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and the Representation of the People Act, 1950. Applicant Alleges Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions Rendering the Election Petition Not Maintainable.

The matter pertained to an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Sections 81, 83 and 86 of the Repr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Maintenance Order in Execution Proceedings — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Family Court's Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Upheld to Direct Payment of ₹25,000 Per Month to Wife and Child.

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhara B.T., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 08.10.2021 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Suit, Holding Section 134(2) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Confers Additional Forum. Plaintiff Allowed to Sue Where It Carries on Business Even If Cause of Action Arose Elsewhere.

The case arose out of a suit for perpetual injunction filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited (plaintiff) against Ashique Chemicals and others (defendants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974.

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and...