Search Results for "ready forward"

1164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a First Appeal registered as such but to be decided as a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder in Stabbing Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Accused's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Stabbing Deceased Multiple Times Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive.

The appellant, Clive Ellens, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Valentin Stephen Dias and sentenced to life im...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aarif Ali Yusuf Ali Sayyad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that orders were not sufficiently clear and specific to warrant contempt proceedings, and the remedy lies in execution.

The petitioner, Sri Sai Krishna Constructions, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of two orders passed by the Bombay High Court i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...