CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.101 OF 2012
24 Nov 2014The appellant, Appa s/o Gajabapu Koradkar, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Ahmednagar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the...
Search Results for "missing complaint"
1213 result(s) found
Found 1213 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of SC/ST Act Proceedings Against Public Servants in Intra-Caste Dispute. Absence of Caste-Based Malice and 8-Year Delay in Filing Complaint Found Fatal to Prosecution Under SC/ST Act.
26 Jul 2026The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh quashing criminal proceedings under the Sc...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Demand and Acceptance Evidence. Court Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
22 Oct 2024The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Prakash Pandharinath Rajput, a Police Sub-Inspector, who was charged with demanding and acc...
- 674
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case: High Court Erred in Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Revisional Jurisdiction. Presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.
2 Apr 2025The appellant-complainant alleged that he advanced a loan of Rs.22,00,000 to the respondent-accused, who issued a cheque dated 17.03.2010 for the same...
- 1096
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Appellant in Bigamy and Forgery Case Due to Abuse of Process. Proceedings Were Maliciously Instituted with Ulterior Motive After Investigation Revealed No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 494, 495, 416, 420, 504, 506, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Following Principles from State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal.
10 Feb 2022The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the Allahabad High Court's order declining to quash criminal proceedings against the appellant. The app...
- 569
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in IPC Sections 366A and 506 Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Shoddy Investigation. Conviction overturned as prosecution failed to prove case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions in testimonies, delay in FIR registration, and inadequate investigation under Sections 366A and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
28 Jul 2020The Supreme Court heard a criminal appeal by Parminder Kaur challenging her conviction under Sections 366A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, whi...
- 211
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Failure to Prove Common Object of Unlawful Assembly. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution did not establish that the appellant shared the common object to commit murder.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Gangadhar Baburao Kangane, along with ten other respondents, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 302, 307, ...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(d)(i)(n), 377, 323 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
5 Dec 2025The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Christian Rajendran, Joy Rajendran, and Salomi Rajendran against their conviction and sentence under S...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder of Brother Based on Dying Declaration and Eyewitness Testimony. Acquittal of Co-Accused Wife for Lack of Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Upheld.
21 Dec 2016The case involves two appeals arising from the same trial court judgment. Criminal Appeal No.877 of 2008 was filed by the original accused Suresh Shri...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Former Directors in Companies Act Complaint — Complaint Barred by Limitation and Filed Without Mandatory Sanction. The court held that the complaint under Section 538(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 1956 was time-barred under Section 468 Cr.P.C. and lacked prior sanction under Section 538(3) of the Act, warranting quashing of proceedings.
23 Mar 2021The present criminal petition was filed by Sri Avinash Subramanyam and Smt. Vani Sharma, former directors of M/s. Shimbu Imports and Exports (P) Ltd. ...
- 96
