Search Results for "fresh notification"

2669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Illegal Structures in CRZ Area. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to retain unauthorized constructions violating CRZ Notification 2011 and Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by 30 individuals challenging the demolition of their structures by the Goa Coastal Zone Management ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in Maize Import License Dispute — Actual User Condition Not Violated. Petitioner Trading House Allowed to Import Maize Through Canalizing Agency Without Being Actual User Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a trading house incorporated in 1919 and engaged in export of rice, oil seed, food grains and puls...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Reference Court's award of Rs.40 per sq ft for acquired land upheld as market value based on sale instances and location.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), the acquiring body, against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Court Erred in Rejecting Claim Without Considering Evidence. Enhancement of Compensation Granted Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Luis Alex Cardozo, owned land in Margao, Goa, which was acquired by the respondents (Deputy Collector and Executive Engineer) for the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds University Ordinance on MBBS Exam Revaluation — Regulation 5 of RGUHS Ordinance dated 01.02.2021 held valid and not violative of Article 14. The court found that the ordinance prescribing a uniform revaluation fee and procedure was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.

The petitioners, Vishweshwara C and Shashank S. Reddy, were first-year MBBS students at Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Vydehi Institute of...