Search Results for "discretionary orders"

2022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 169 Days. Bureaucratic Delays Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by the Sub Post Master, Gandhinagar, against Meenaben Bhaw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to 399-Day Delay — Condonation Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause. Internal administrative delays and employee turnover held not sufficient to explain each day of delay under Section 51 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Father's Custody Petition for Minor Son in Habeas Corpus Proceedings. Father, acquitted of murder charges, held entitled to custody of his child as natural guardian under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, despite allegations of misconduct.

The petitioner, Amol Ramesh Pawar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking custody of his minor son Teja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Application in Rent Dispute - Eviction Upheld Under Bombay Rent Act for Non-Payment of Arrears Before First Hearing Date

The High Court dismissed a revision application filed by the tenant challenging eviction orders passed under the Bombay Rent Act -- The landlord had p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute Between Society, Developer, and Occupants. Court Directs Handover of Possession Subject to Payment of Compensation Under Development Agreement.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as Receiver of two flats occupied by the appellants and direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...