Search Results for "advance deposit"

1314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Railway Concession Dispute — Directs Release of Iron Ore Consignment. Circular Offering 30% Concession on Iron Ore Transport Held Applicable to Consignments Booked Before Withdrawal.

The petitioners, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports (exporter) and NECC Roadways (transporter), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Cheque Issued as Security for Advance of Rs.80 Lakh Dishonoured — Accused Failed to Prove Absence of Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by HMT (International) Limited, a public limited company, against M/s Nucor Wires Limited and its directors (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance — Trial Court Decree Granting Specific Performance and Cancellation of Sale Deed Under Challenge. The Court Reserved Judgment; Outcome Not Stated in This Excerpt.

These two regular first appeals arose from the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015 in O.S.No.594/2005 passed by the XI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010220972024_1

These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit, Holding Suit Not Barred by Limitation and Licensee Not Tenant, and Remands for Fresh Hearing. License Agreement Did Not Create Tenancy; Defendants Failed to Prove Protected Licensee Status Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 25.06.2003 passed by the Appellate ...