Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1904 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1904 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Limitation Dispute — Article 64 Limitation Act, 1963 Applicable. High Court erred in holding suit within limitation based on earlier observation; limitation runs from date of dispossession, not from declaration of title.

The present appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute. The appellants are the children of late Srinivas Shetty, who had executed a sale deed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court's Order on Court-Fees Valuation in Suit for Registration under Section 77 of Registration Act. Suit for Enforcement of Statutory Obligation Not Susceptible of Monetary Valuation, Governed by Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court-fees Act, 1958, Not Section 6(xi).

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.

Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation and Cause of Action Are Triable Issues. Court holds that Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cannot be decided on disputed facts regarding knowledge of sale deeds and limitation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by Defendant No.15 (M/s. Mahabharat Builders) challenging the trial court's order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Awards Passed in Hire Purchase Dispute. The Court Examines Objections Relating to Stamp Duty, Admissibility of Documents, and Jurisdiction of the Arbitrator.

The dispute stemmed from a Hire Purchase Agreement dated 24 April 1995 between the petitioners and the respondent for eight Honda Accord cars, accompa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order in Civil Revision Petition Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with CPC Provisions — Petitioner's Application for Temporary Injunction Dismissed Without Proper Consideration of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioner, Sangameshgouda Mudigoudra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari ...