Search Results for "overall view"

3139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court Erred in Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact. Will Execution Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 65(c) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a dispute over the validity of a Will dated 30.04.1980 executed by Chandu Ram in favor of his grandsons (sons of defendant No.5 Soha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Section 80IA Deduction Case for Container Handling Cranes. Leasing of cranes to JNPT does not constitute developing, maintaining and operating an infrastructural facility under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on limitation and quantum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 20 February 2009 passed by a s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137632012_1

...