Search Results for "negative response"

1013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Sealing Procedures. Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband was same as seized sample.

The petitioner, Sri K K Suresh, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Ponnampet in CC No.523/2011 for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeals Against Acquittal for Murder and Enhancement of Sentence in Dowry Death Case. Conviction for Cruelty Under Section 498-A IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Abetment of Suicide Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two appeals by the State of Maharashtra against a judgment of the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No. 483 of 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Substantial Questions of Law Not Formulated Under Section 100 CPC; Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdictional Error.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants challenging the concurrent judgment and decree passed by the courts below in a suit for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...