Search Results for "interest refund"

2413 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2413 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Bank's Appeal in Bond Amount Recovery Dispute — Refund of Rs. 3,00,000 Set Aside. Clause 11(k) of Appointment Letter and Indemnity Bond Held Valid and Enforceable as Employee Resigned Before Completing Stipulated Service Period.

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by Vijaya Bank (now Bank of Baroda) against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows B.Ed. Admission Petitions Due to Non-Communication of Deficiency Notices. Admission Cancellation Set Aside as Candidates Were Not Given Opportunity to Rectify Deficiencies Under Relevant University Ordinances.

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by students whose admissions to the B.Ed. course were cancelled by the respective colleges or universi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. No substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC as findings are based on evidence and not perverse.

The judgment involves four second appeals arising from a property dispute between Arun s/o Narayanrao Kale (original plaintiff) and the legal represen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Writ Petition on Expiry of E-Way Bill for Exported Goods, Holds Penalty Under Section 129(1)(a) of CGST Act Not Imposable. The Court directed refund of penalty amount of Rs. 18,00,140/- as the issue was covered by Marcowagon Retail Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India.

The petitioner, Balkrishna Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging orders dated 29.11.2025 and 02.12.2026 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...