WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "commercial execution"
2042 result(s) found
Found 2042 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Against Trial Court's Order to Decide Amendment Application Before Return of Plaint. Procedural Order Set Aside as Contrary to Order 7 Rule 10 CPC — Inherent Lack of Jurisdiction Cannot Be Cured by Amendment.
25 Sep 2025The petitioner, Akshay Quenim, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the Civil ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Jan 2024The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Tender Exclusion Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by State. Exclusion from tender for school uniform cloth procurement set aside as evaluation committee failed to consider petitioners' compliance with technical specifications.
12 Mar 2024The petitioners, Kanchan India Limited and Arvind Cotsyn India Limited, challenged their exclusion from a tender process issued by the Government of M...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Investment Amount Under Order XXXVII CPC — Defendants Failed to Disclose Triable Issues or Obtain Leave to Defend. The court held that the guarantors are jointly and severally liable for the defaulted investment amount with contractual interest under the investment agreement and guarantee.
29 Aug 2023The plaintiff, India Realty Excellence Fund II LLP, a limited liability partnership registered as a Category-II Alternative Investment Fund under SEBI...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance of Share Pledge Agreement. Court holds that a prima facie case for specific performance of a contract to create a pledge is made out when the contract is clear and the plaintiff has performed its obligations.
23 Jun 2022The appellant, World Crest Advisors LLP, filed a Commercial Suit against Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd and others seeking specific performance of a share p...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.
6 Feb 2020The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Injunction on Bank Guarantee Invocation in Arbitration Matter. The court set aside an ex-parte ad-interim order under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that bank guarantees are independent contracts and cannot be injuncted without hearing the opposite party.
7 Jan 2016The appellants, Reliance Infrastructure Ltd and P.S.Toll Road Pvt Ltd, entered into a construction contract with the respondent, M/s Roadway Solution ...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Injunction on Bank Guarantee Invocation in Arbitration Matter. The court set aside an ex-parte ad-interim order restraining invocation of bank guarantees under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that such orders require hearing and exceptional circumstances.
7 Jan 2016The appeal was filed by the original respondent (appellant) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ex-parte ad...
- 64
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.
30 Nov -0001The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...
- 95
