Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1763 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1763 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Remand for Fixing Purchase Price Under Section 32H of Bombay Tenancy Act. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Upheld as Tenancy Findings Had Attained Finality and Land Had Turned Rayatava Under Section 88.

17 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Sidappa Padmanna Berad, a former Sanadi Inamdar, filed a writ petition challenging the appellate order of the Special Land Acquisition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Navi Mumbai Airport Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 6, 9, 11 — Petitioner failed to prove ownership or possession of acquired land; compensation rightly awarded to recorded tenants.

2 May 2023

The petitioner, Ashok Hari Shitlani, filed a writ petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

7 Jan 2020

The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Heirs' Petition in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delay and Laches. False Statement Regarding Knowledge of Proceedings Leads to Dismissal Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

12 Apr 2024

The petition was filed by the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased original tenant, Baban Vishnu Shivale, under Article 227 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Suit Based on Lease of Open Plot - Decree No.43525 Applicable, No Notice Required. The court held that the landlord-tenant relationship is governed by Decree No.43525, which does not require a notice before filing an eviction suit for a lease of an open plot created after its extension.

16 Sep 2005

The case involves a second appeal by the plaintiff/landlord against the dismissal of his eviction suit. The plaintiff owned land at Betim, Goa, and by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit in Bona Fide Requirement Dispute. Appellate Court's Reversal Upheld as Landlord Failed to Prove Reasonable and Bona Fide Need for Suit Premises Under Section 13(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar I. Agarwal, through his constituted authority, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell and Possessory Receipts Established Plaintiff's Continuous Readiness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

4 Feb 2016

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original defendant against a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Zilla Parishad Contract Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Due to Premature Filing Before Expiry of Statutory Notice Period. The court held that a suit filed before the expiry of the two-month notice period under Section 280 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 is premature and the period of notice cannot be excluded under Section 15(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 May 2005

The appellants, the Executive Engineer and Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, were original defendants in a suit filed by the resp...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Trial Court Decree in Possession Dispute Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Finding of Possession and Dispossession Held Perverse Due to Contradictory Evidence and Absence of Proof.

9 Jan 2020

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Application for Possession from Official Liquidator in Bank Winding-Up — No Alternative Premises Provided Despite Earlier Direction. Section 457 of Companies Act, 1956 does not empower court to order eviction of liquidator without suitable alternative accommodation being made available.

15 Apr 2026

The Applicant, Shree Vishnu Holdings & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., is the owner and landlord of premises situated at Jayshree Chambers, 82 Nagindas Master ...

68 69 70 71 72

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)