Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2305 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2305 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver for Possession of Flats for Demolition and Reconstruction. Court holds that disputes regarding redevelopment of a cooperative housing society are not arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as they involve statutory rights and obligations under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

18 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Bharat Infrastructure and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Religious Endowments Case — Commissioner Not a Court, Section 5 Limitation Act Not Applicable. Delay Condonation by Commissioner Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Set Aside as Commissioner Lacks Power to Apply Section 5 of Limitation Act.

3 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the right to receive first respect as an Ambalam in a village in Tamil Nadu. The appellant, Ganesan, throug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator Mandate Due to Expiry of Time Limit Under Arbitration Clause — Failure to Complete Arbitration Within Stipulated Period Results in Termination of Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the mandate of the arbitrator stood terminated under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitration was not completed within the time limit prescribed in clause 21 of the agreement.

1 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Teltech Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Interference Under Article 136. Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11(6A) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Prior to Its Omission by 2019 Amendment.

5 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a civil appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition against a High Court decision refusing to appoint an arbitrator under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

25 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Termination of Services Agreement by State Assembly Secretariat Held Illegal by Arbitrator; Court's Decision on Frustration and Party Distinctness Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

25 Nov 2025

Background: The dispute arose from an agreement dated 5 December 2015 between the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly (UPLA) Secretariat and Tata Consu...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 1495 Days Delay in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

22 Aug 2019

The present review petition was filed by Electronics & Controls Power Systems Private Limited under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code ...

68 69 70 71 72

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)